Appearance
Governance Overview
Manna Protocol is governed through MetaDAO — a futarchy-based governance system where decisions are made by prediction markets, not token votes.
Why Not Token Voting?
Traditional DAO governance suffers from well-known problems:
- Low participation — most token holders never vote
- Plutocracy — large holders dominate outcomes
- Uninformed voting — voters don't always understand the technical implications
- Vote buying — votes can be purchased or bribed
Futarchy addresses these issues by replacing voting with market-based decision making.
How Manna Governance Works
- A proposal is submitted (e.g., "Add a new collateral type" or "Change the minimum CR")
- Two conditional markets are created:
- Market A: "MANNA price if proposal passes"
- Market B: "MANNA price if proposal fails"
- Participants trade on these markets to express their views
- If Market A settles higher than Market B, the proposal passes
- The market that "loses" is unwound — traders get refunded
The result: proposals that the market believes will increase protocol value are adopted.
Governance Token
MANNA — the protocol's governance token (to be launched). MANNA is used in futarchy markets to evaluate proposals.
What Can Governance Change?
- Protocol parameters (fees, collateral ratios, etc.)
- Adding new collateral types
- Protocol upgrades
- Treasury allocation
- Emergency actions
For more on the mechanics of futarchy, see MetaDAO & Futarchy.